Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1205

reference
25-tree-1
name
1205
tree-preservation-order

undefined

25-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.029541 50.889251)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.029470 50.889243,-1.029474 50.889257,-1.029483 50.889270,-1.029499 50.889280,-1.029519 50.889286,-1.029540 50.889289,-1.029562 50.889287,-1.029582 50.889280,-1.029598 50.889271,-1.029609 50.889258,-1.029612 50.889244,-1.029609 50.889230,-1.029599 50.889218,-1.029584 50.889208,-1.029564 50.889201,-1.029542 50.889199,-1.029520 50.889201,-1.029500 50.889207,-1.029484 50.889217,-1.029474 50.889229,-1.029470 50.889243)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL